A Brilliant Madness: A Mathematical Genius Descent into Madness

The first time I've heard about John Nash, it was in 2008. I was 21. I've watched the movie about John Nash. I felt related to John Nash's works to some extent as I was introduced game theory in an introductory course during my maths studies.

But I'm not John Nash.
I'm like Nash. I'm interested in different problems, trying to encompass the whole of mathematics in one body. Partial differential equations, algebraic geometry, game theory, economic reasoning, things that we have in common, John and me.

I'm not 'his' bright. I'm more a lateal thinker that can think outside the box, outside the limits of models.
My main interest in relating physics to economics and finance. A physicist's approach to economics and finance is relevant in many terms.

I want to be a quantitative strategist in a bank or an investment fund. But do to my illness, I fit to investment banking and investment management best. Only long-term investments. I used to be a very active person ; now, I'm forced to be patient and think everything on the long term.

Mathematicians have a propensy of the excentric.
Uncorrelated psychopathy and mathematics. Obsession with logic.
John's Nash approach to mathematics is to speak mathematics with full fluency. I only know words and sentences for now. 
But my biggest challenges in my life will be to work on pure geometry, topology applied to economics and quantitative finance.

I know that after having earnt some good money from a career on Wall Street, even as a late-bloomer, I will join a research group and become a professor in finance, economics and mathematics.

I recover confidence, intelligence and dignity.